Welcome to ecological landscape design. This course is under construction.
*YouTube pulled this video without an explanation. My appeal failed.
Stopping virus replication without harming normal cellular processes involves targeting the various steps of virus replication. Many coronaviruses can be inhibited by a molecule that targets the RNA-dependent, RNA polymerase of coronaviruses.
Remdesivir (aka GS-5734) Inhibition of Coronaviruses https://stm.sciencemag.org/content/9/396/eaal3653
Remdesivir inhiits MERS RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase https://www.jbc.org/content/early/2020/02/24/jbc.AC120.013056.abstract
We have come a long way from George Beadle’s “one gene, one enzyme” hypothesis. This video explains how a surprisingly low number of protein-coding genes into a surprisingly large number of protein variations.
Understandably, there has recently been an increased interest in viruses. Here, we will tie our discussion of the Central Dogma of Biology to viruses. The typical flow of genetic information from DNA to RNA to protein is often modified by viruses, which have a variety of genome types.
Building off of the Central Dogma of Molecular Biology episode, we take a close look at RNA and the many functions of these molecules in a cell.
The Central Dogma of Biology provides a foundation for molecular biology. This video goes over the general flow of genetic information, enzymes involved in the process, and an intro to thinking about controlling the rate of each stage.
Buster Bear was having a lazy day. But as the sun reached higher into the sky, his fur started to get hot and his stomach was starting to growl.
“All right” he said to himself. “Time to get a move on.”
Slowly and methodically, Buster Bear started to head downhill to the Laughing Brook. The movement felt good to his well-rested muscles and the water ahead looked inviting.
As he approached the Laughing Brook, Buster noticed that he wasn’t the only one that had thought about having fish as a mid-morning snack. Once he was close, he realized that it was Little Joe Otter. He also came to realize that the otter had been successful. Little Joe Otter had a nice big trout in his mouth!
Buster Bear crept up to the unsuspecting otter and snarled. As you can imagine, poor Little Joe Otter panicked at the sound, dropped the fish, and dove into the nearby water.
“Just as I had hoped!” Buster Bear thought as he pounced on the trout before it flip-flopped its way down the stream bank.
Little Joe Otter popped his head out of the water of the water and stared coldly at Buster Bear’s mouth.
Buster Bear stubbornly stood there and eventually said, “If you would like the fish back, just come get it.”
This did nothing to get Little Joe Otter to stop his unblinking gaze, so Buster Bear repeated his half-hearted offer. “Come get your fish if you want it.”
Furious, Little Joe Otter dove under the water and slipped downstream until he met Billy Mink. It didn’t take long to tell Billy about his encounter with Buster Bear. Billy Mink listened to Little Joe’s tale and nodded sympathetically. However, being a practical sort of animal, Billy Mink could only say, “There’s not much you can do about it, is there?”
Stewing in his anger, Little Joe Otter thought over his options until a plot for revenge took root in his mind. Without a word, Little Joe Otter took to the water again and made his way upstream until he spotted Buster Bear.
It was clear that one fish did not satisfy the lazy bear’s appetite, so Buster Bear was progressing from one deep pool to the next. Little Joe Otter picked up on Buster’s plan and moved quickly into action. He first went to the pool Buster Bear was going to next. Once there, he swam at a frantic pace in circles to scare away the fish in the pool and disturb the mud to make the water murky.
Buster Bear fished unsuccessfully there for a while and, discouraged, moved on to the next pool only to find the conditions to be similar. All day long, Little Joe Otter sabotaged the lazy bear’s fishing. Buster Bear’s stomach continued to growl and Little Joe Otter’s stomach joined in the chorus.
Biology connection: Food resources, like fish, are prized by many different types of animals. The battle for food is called competition. The population size of one type of animal is often limited not only by the amount of food in an area but also by whether other types of animals eat that food, too.
Re-write of “Thornton Burgess Bedtime Stories” chapter 1.
For Conversational Biology series – topic POLS
To learn a topic, it is nice to have a central framework upon which to build your “mind map”. When it comes to biology, my central framework is called “The Central Dogma of Biology”. To get us started learning about biology, I think it is appropriate to provide this concept for you to use when building your mind map of biology.
If we go back in time to 1956, we would find that Francis Crick was an important figure in biology, particularly molecular biology. Just a few years earlier, he had looked at Rosalind Franklin’s data and, along with James Watson, had described the structure of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA). This was a big deal because biologist were beginning to come to grips with the idea that DNA is the molecule (a type of macromolecule under the umbrella of “nucleic acids”) that stores genetic information. Prior to this, protein was the top dog in the minds of most scientists. DNA was considered “boring” and proteins (another type of macromolecule) were considered to be more interesting, so it stood to reason that proteins would have been suspected to be the storage molecule for molecular biology.
Anyway, back to the central dogma of biology (aka the central dogma of molecular biology). This concept was proposed by Francis Crick. His framework can be overly simplified to “DNA is transcribed to RNA and RNA is translated to protein” or, even more simply, “DNA à RNA à protein”, where the arrows are steps that read information of one molecule to create the next molecule in the progression.
Let’s back up a step again. What’s RNA? It, like DNA, belongs to the nucleic acid macromolecule class. It looks a lot like DNA, but it is one oxygen molecule short, so RNA (ribonucleic acid) has a similar name to DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid). Notice that the difference in the names is “deoxy”, which is a scientific way of saying “lacks an oxygen”.
Francis Crick had one more arrow in his “DNA à RNA à protein” framework and that was a reverse arrow between DNA and RNA (DNA ß RNA). This left open the possibility that information in the form of RNA could be used to create a new molecule of DNA. This turns out to be true, so this process is called “reverse transcription” since the process of DNA à RNA is called transcription.
One final point, Crick wisely avoided drawing an arrow from protein back to RNA (RNA ß protein). When we get to the topic of the genetic code, we will see why “reverse translation” isn’t a thing.
Previous article: Preface